I have sometime heard this fact dismissed as ‘inevitable’, since it is predominantly women who (have the audacity to) possess the biological apparatus necessary for childbirth. This is a non-argument. In my view, a system that fails to accommodate highly skilled and talented scientists (regardless of gender) after they take on new responsibilities is spectacularly broken.
We know that childbirth is not the only reason for the gender disparity in our profession. Studies have shown that on the basis of identical job applications, women are judged as less competent and deserving of a lower starting salary. This phenomenon and its knock-on effects must be recognised and remedied through proactive measures.
It’s not all doom and gloom. In recent years there has been increasing acknowledgement of the very real obstacles facing women in our profession. This awareness has been driven by the efforts of organisations such as the American Astronomical Society’s Committee on the Status of Women and the Astronomical Society of Australia’s Chapter for Women in Astronomy, of which I am the current Chair.
The ASA Chapter for Women in Astronomy
The ASA Chapter for Women in Astronomy was formed in 2009 with two primary aims; (i) to monitor the status of women in our professional community and (ii) to encourage appropriate representation of women in positions of seniority and influence. We provide networking, mentoring and professional development opportunities for our members through an annual ‘Women in Astronomy Workshop’. Now in its fourth year, this meeting brings together approximately 80-100 astronomers from around Australia to take part in facilitated discussions, professional coaching and networking. It is a popular event, which provides a supportive and empowering environment to discuss and plan actions towards gender equity.
This year’s Workshop, entitled We are all made of stars, is taking part this week – on the 28th-29th August – at the Australian National University. This year’s focus will be to identify positive changes that will establish equity and diversity within Australian astronomy.
Participants will take part in practical sessions including association tests on race and gender, discussion sessions on causal or ‘normalised’ prejudices and role-playing of tricky situations. Guest speakers include Elizabeth Broderick: the Australian Human Rights Sex Discrimination Commissioner, Cordelia Fine: academic and author of “Delusions of Gender” and Senator the Hon. Michaelia Cash: Minister Assisting the Prime Minister for Women.
A new national initiative: The Pleiades Awards
At this year’s Workshop, we are also launching a national gender diversity initiative called The Pleiades Awards. Aimed at astronomy departments and research institutes in Australia, the Pleiades Awards provide a framework for organisations to monitor and improve the status of women.
Following the nomenclature of the U.K.’s Athena SWAN gender equity scheme, there are three levels of Pleiades Award; Gold, Silver and Bronze. Full details are available on our website.
Bronze is the entry-level award for organisations that have examined their current conduct against the aims of the Chapter, developed a credible plan of action towards states best practices and demonstrated commitment to implement changes consistently across the organisation including a clear line of responsibility.
The Silver award will be given to organisations with a sustained record, of at least two years, monitoring the conduct of the organisation and working towards best practices. The Silver level also recognises leadership in promoting examples of best practice to other organisations in the astronomy community.
The Gold Pleiades award will recognise a truly outstanding and sustained commitment to best practice in relation to gender equity. Attaining this level is very challenging and a Gold Pleiades is an exceptional accomplishment.
There is no limit to the number of awards that can be given per year and our aim is that every astronomy research institute in Australia will begin to work through the award levels this year.
Is this really needed?
Many of Australia’s science leaders are aware of the problems in our system and are committed to tackling them. But it is still all too common for our Chapter to receive first-hand accounts of bullying, harassment and marginalisation. This will only stop when organisations are held accountable for the work environment and culture they generate (or tolerate).
I have heard accounts of senior scientists publicly diminishing efforts by our members to improve their workplace environments. I speak to professional, smart, confident women who feel alone and disempowered, simply because the majority of good people are either unaware or are simply doing nothing to support them.
The Pleiades Awards scheme is a step towards unifying the efforts of our Chapter nationwide. For this reason, I hope that the Pleiades Awards is embraced universally so that we are able to provide a practical and supportive framework for organisations to channel their efforts and towards creating sustainably better workplaces.
Hi I was wondering if we could encourage amateur astronomy societies in a similar direction… with our outreach programs we reach an awful lot of girls and young women.
@Jamesteach
Wow, bitter a little? I stayed in astronomy because I’m surrounded by interesting, inspired people, who love what they do — and who often have interesting lives outside of astronomy as well (sporting, music, the arts…). Sorry you had such a bad experience.
Hi Lisa,
This is super-interesting. As you probably know, the SAGE forum of the Academy of Sciences is currently looking into how an Athena SWAN type program might work in Australia— I like that you have just gone ahead and done it!
Do you envision that other disciplines might join the Pleiades program? (Btw Pleiades is a great name.)
Julie.
I left astronomy just because astronomers had no life. Most of them autistically spend their day updating even their Facebook accounts with science related chat, as they have no concept of how to be socially balanced. Left to choose between spending my day surrounded by a caring family, or a generally self-involved and slightly narcissistic science community (which in my view mostly were grown-up suffering kids who were bullied in school for being different), I chose the former! Why wouldn’t anyone?